3How close are we to targeting the leukemia stem cell?
Introduction
The question of how close we are to targeting the leukemia stem cell (LSC) has a complicated answer. In the past few years, there has been significant progress in three relevant areas: functional assays, molecular studies, and preclinical models. The functional assays that we use to define leukemia-initiating cells and to evaluate the cells both biologically and from a therapeutic standpoint have become very sophisticated. Molecular studies have been advancing at multiple levels, and preclinical models show intriguing results, though nobody has been able to directly mimic a human patient response in a sophisticated xenograft. Perhaps most importantly and directly, some of the therapeutics emerging from preclinical model systems are showing exciting results.
Two major challenges remain to bringing the targeting of the leukemia stem cell to clinical reality: the cell cycle status of LSCs and the heterogeneity of LSCs. Nearly a decade ago, Guan, Gerhard, and Hogge [1] demonstrated that, at least in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), leukemia-initiating cells are predominantly quiescent, which has obvious ramifications for therapeutic targeting. It is also becoming more apparent that the tumor-initiating cell that we are attempting to target is a heterogeneous target. A recent analysis clearly demonstrated heterogeneity of LSCs at a phenotypic level and multiple functional levels within the same patient over time during the course of pathogenesis [2]. And when comparing different patients, the LSCs vary enormously. Furthermore, there has been an enormous amount of debate about what controls heterogeneity and some aspects of tumor-initiating cell potential, cell cycle status, and intrinsic vs extrinsic factors [3]. These two issues are at the core of discussions about drug development and experimental therapeutics. Unfortunately, these issues are rarely taken into consideration when drug development begins.
Section snippets
Approaches for selective targeting of LSCs
Four different approaches exist to selectively target LSCs: target “stem-cell” properties, i.e., self-renewal; induce cycling of quiescent LSCs to make them sensitive to conventional agents; employ/induce immune-based mechanisms; and target tumor-specific physiology. Targeting self-renewal properties of stem cells has worked in certain murine models [4], [5], [6], but it has yet to work well in humans. Certain cytokines have been found to induce cycling activity of quiescent murine leukemic
Targeting stem-cell specific physiology
A number of small molecules selectively target LSCs, possibly by similar mechanisms. Parthenolide, a naturally occurring small molecule, is one of them, and is much less toxic to the normal stem-cell population than other agents [9]. The same properties can be found in several other naturally occurring small molecules, such as 4-hydroxynonenal, a lipid peroxidation product; celastrol and piperlongumine, plant-derived compounds; and prostaglandin J2, which is naturally found in mammals (Fig. 1)
Conclusion
Oxidative stress is a component of many forms of therapy. It is not particularly useful, however, with respect to targeting LSCs unless it is done in the context of therapeutic regimens that can also inhibit mechanisms that restore or allow cells to respond to an oxidative insult. The combination of oxidative stress and inhibition of redox balance seems to lead to significant susceptibility or cell death in leukemic stem cell and bulk leukemia cell populations, though not in normal stem-cell
Conflict of interest statement
No relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest.
References (15)
- et al.
Detection, isolation, and stimulation of quiescent primitive leukemic progenitor cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Blood
(2003) - et al.
Loss of beta-catenin impairs the renewal of normal and CML stem cells in vivo
Cancer Cell
(2007) - et al.
CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells
Cell
(2009) - et al.
The sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide induces apoptosis of human acute myelogenous leukemia stem and progenitor cells
Blood
(2005) - et al.
Discovery of agents that eradicate leukemia stem cells using an in silico screen of public gene expression data
Blood
(2008) - et al.
Melampomagnolide B: a new antileukemic sesquiterpene
Bioorg Med Chem
(2011) - et al.
FoxOs are critical mediators of hematopoietic stem cell resistance to physiologic oxidative stress
Cell
(2007)
Cited by (15)
Repressed Ca<sup>2+</sup> clearance in parthenolide-treated murine brain bEND.3 endothelial cells
2015, European Journal of PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :One of the advantages of parthenolide is its non-cytotoxic effects in non-tumor cells (reviewed in Mathema et al., 2012). Further, this lactone appears to be selective against cancer stem cell, and is currently under clinical trials (Pei and Jordon, 2012; Ghantous et al., 2010; 2013). Parthenolide has also been reported to be a cardioprotectant.
Parthenolide: From plant shoots to cancer roots
2013, Drug Discovery TodayCitation Excerpt :In fact, compounds targeting these pathways might synergize in eradicating tumors, evidenced by the synergy between PTL and PI3K inhibitors [47] and between small molecule inhibitors of NF-κB and JAK/STAT pathways [48]. Another repeatedly reported mechanism by which PTL selectively kills CSCs is overturning their redox balance, in leukemia and/or lymphoma and solid tumors (Table 2) [24]. Thioredoxin and glutathione systems counteract cellular oxidative stress to maintain redox homeostasis, and PTL targets both systems [22].
Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Micheliolide Analogs to Eliminate Leukemic Stem Cells in the Bone Marrow
2022, Advanced TherapeuticsApplications of sesquiterpene lactones: A review of some potential success cases
2020, Applied Sciences (Switzerland)Crucial role of oxidative stress in bactericidal effect of parthenolide against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae
2018, Pest Management Science