Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 24, Issue 4 , Pages 509-514, December 2011

Should the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) in morphologic complete remission alter post-remission strategy in AML?

  • Richard M. Stone, MD, Professor of Medicine (Director)

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
    • Adult Leukemia Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, M1b-17, Boston, MA 02215, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 617 632 2214; Fax: +1 617 632 2933.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, particularly via multiparameter flow (MPF) cytometry assessed after chemotherapy, has been very useful in the prognostic and therapeutic approach for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. While many studies suggest that MRD monitoring (using MPF or other techniques that are more sensitive than morphologic examination) might be able to accurately predict patient outcome, there is very little data suggesting that treatment decisions should be altered based on such measurements. Proving that MPF-defined MRD should prompt a change in treatment plan optimally requires a contemporaneous control group or at least a historical control treated in standard fashion.

Keywords: minimal residual disease, multiparameter flow (MPF), cytometry, post-remission, acute myeloid leukemia, AML, FLT3-ITD

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6926(11)00086-7

doi:10.1016/j.beha.2011.09.006

Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 24, Issue 4 , Pages 509-514, December 2011