Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 551-555, December 2009

Should double cord blood transplants be the preferred choice when a sibling donor is unavailable?

  • John E. Wagner, MD (Professor and Clinical Director)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 612 626 2961; Fax: +1 612 626 4074.

Blood and Marrow Transplant Program and Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Umbilical cord blood transplant is an important alternative stem cell source for both children and adults with haematologic malignancies. Umbilical cord blood units are rapidly available and have less stringent human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching requirements. Mismatch at two antigens actually improves the risk of relapse for umbilical cord blood transplant recipients with relatively low risk of severe acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. However, umbilical cord blood transplant is associated with an inferior neutrophil recovery rate when compared with other stem cell sources. Therefore, we have explored double-unit umbilical cord blood transplants, not only as a platform for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of new methods of ex vivo expansion or methods of enhanced homing, but also as an approach in itself to remedy the problem of limited cell dose, particularly for adults.

Keywords: umbilical cord blood transplant, double, single, mismatch, HLA, graft versus leukaemia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6926(09)00063-2

doi:10.1016/j.beha.2009.09.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 551-555, December 2009