Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 79-83, March 2008

Should all unrelated donors for transplantation be matched?

  • Daniel Weisdorf, MD (Professor of Medicine, Director)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 612 624 3101; Fax: +1 612 625 6919.

Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Transplant, University of Minnesota Medical School, MMC 480; PWB 14-142, 516 Delaware Street, SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0480, USA

Previous analyses have suggested that hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an unrelated donor results in better survival if the patient is younger and, possibly also if the donor is younger. Additionally, survival is improved if HCT is performed during early disease stage and if the recipient and possibly the donor are cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative. Equivocal data have been published comparing bone marrow vs. (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) G-CSF-stimulated peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation. A randomized trial is underway by the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network that is testing the prospective comparison of bone marrow vs. primed peripheral blood grafts from unrelated donors and patients with hematologic malignancies. Of most significance, however, is that the best donor is HLA-compatible, healthy, promptly available, and willing to give the requested product for HCT.

Key words: Allogeneic transplantation, Unrelated donors, HLA-matching

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6926(07)00101-6

doi:10.1016/j.beha.2007.11.011

Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 79-83, March 2008