Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 295-310, June 2007

Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Conditioning

  • Johan Aschan, MD, PhD (Associate Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +46 8 585 800 00; Fax: +46 8 774 87 25.

Centre for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Division of Haematology, Department of Medicine, M54, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden

After the introduction of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation in the 1970s, a variety of conditioning regimens has been developed. However, none has proven to be superior. Fractionation of the irradiation results in less toxic side-effects, but the total dose has to be increased to obtain similar immunosuppressive effects. Data from randomized trials indicate that among patients with myeloid leukaemia, busulfan in combination with cyclophosphamide results in similar outcome, while a regimen containing total body irradiation is probably still the best for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Busulfan treatment can be optimized by targeted steady-state concentration or with the use of intravenous preparations. Intensified regimens decrease the relapse incidence, but because of a higher mortality from transplant-related causes survival is unchanged. Reduced-intensity conditioning can reduce transplant-related mortality and offer otherwise ineligible patients a potentially curative treatment. Long-term results are unknown.

Key words: conditioning, total body irradiation, cyclophosphamide, busulfan, reduced intensity conditioning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6926(06)00064-8

doi:10.1016/j.beha.2006.09.004

Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 295-310, June 2007